You are here: Home» Faculty» Full-time Faculty» Assistant Professor Wang Huawei , Criminal Law

Assistant Professor Wang Huawei , Criminal Law

 

 

Education Background

2018, Doctor of Laws, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Law (Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law)

2017, Doctor of Laws, Peking University Law School

2011, Bachelor of Laws, China Youth University of Political Studies, Faculty of Law (now University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, School of Politics and Law)

 

Work Experience

Since Sep. 2020, Assistant Professor in Peking University Law School

Jul. 2018 – Aug. 2020, Post-Doctoral Research Fellow in Peking University Law School

 

Research Interests

Cybercrime, Information Criminal Law, Doctrines of Criminal Law, Chinese Criminal Law, Comparative Criminal Law

 

Languages

Mandarin Chinese (mother tongue)

Fluent in English and German

 

Selected Publications

I. Paper

1. Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Neutral Help Behavior, The Jurist, 2020 (3).

2. The Theoretical Construction of Safe Harbor Principle in Criminal Law Doctrine, Peking University Law Journal, 2019 (6).

3. The Systematic Evaluation and Reflection on the Criminal Legislation for Cybercrimes in China, Legal Science Magazine, 2019 (10).

4. Research on Attempt to Crime of Amount, Starting from No. 62 Guiding Case released by Supreme Court, Science of Law, 2019 (5).

5. A Critical Interpretation of the Concept- “Treating Aider as Perpetrator”- in Cyberspace, Law Review, 2019 (4).

6. The Complicity and the Quantitative Elements of Crime in Cyberspace, Criminal Science, 2019 (2).

7. Decriminalization of Minor Offence: Comparative Research and Institution Choice, Global Law Review, 2019 (1).

8. The Criminal Regulation of Trust Fraud in E-commerce and the Concept of Interpretation, Criminal Science, 2018 (6).

9. From Opposition to Combination: A Comparative Research in System of Complicity, Legal Forum, 2017(6).

10. The Collision and Combination of Element Analysis and Offense Analysis, New Approach to the Forms of Mens Rea, Contemporary Law Review, 2017 (5).

11. The Path of Analyzing Criminal Responsibility of Internet Service Provider, Commenting on the “Kuaibo case”, Journal of National Prosecutors College, 2017 (5).

12. A Comparative Study of Criminal Liability of Internet Service Providers,Global Law Review,2016 (4).

13. Theoretical Reconstruction of Proviso in Article Thirteenth of the Criminal Law, In the Background of Transformation of Criminal Law Knowledge, Law Review, 2016 (1).

14. Jurisprudential Inspection and Judicial Application on Malicious Overdraft, Law Science, 2015 (8).

15. Empirical Research on the Proviso in Article Thirteenth of the Criminal Law, A Theoretical Reflection Based on 120 Judgments, The Jurist, 2015 (6).

16. Misunderstanding and Rectification, The Reasonable Existence Space of Sentencing Influencing Conviction, Global Law Review, 2015 (4).

17. The Orientation of System of Complicity in China, A Differentiate System Between Ideality and Reality, Criminal Science, 2015 (2).

18. On the Applicable Conditions of Commutation, The Journal of Gansu Administration Institute, 2013 (1).

19. Possession of Deposits under the View of Integration of Application of Criminal Law and Civil Law, Journal of Law Application, 2014 (1).

20. The Interpretation of Criminal Law in Network Age, China Law Review, 2020 (1).

21. On the Scope of Applicable Objects of Victims Compensation, Jianghan Academic, 2013 (2).

22. On the Criminal Responsibility of Joint Crime in International Criminal Law, Criminal Law Review, 2013 (33).

23. Persisting on the Subjektive Rechtfertigungselemente, Criminal Law Review, 2013 (32).

24. The Development of Online Platform’s Liability in Germany and its Enlightenment, Peking University Law Review, 2020 (1).

 

II. Monograph

Die strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit von Internet-Service-Providern, Ein deutsch-chinesischer Rechtsvergleich, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2019.

 

III. Translation

1. Ulrich Sieber, The Responsibility of Network Service Providers under the Perspective of Comparative Law, Criminal Law Review, 2016 (37). (Cooperated with Zhou Wu)

2. Ulrich Sieber, Criminal Responsibility of Internet Service Providers: Core Issues in General Provisions of Criminal Law, Criminal Law Review, 2016 (4).

3. The Development Process of Objective Imputation Theory, The Study of Criminal Law In Contemporary Germany, 2017 (2).

4. Thomas Weigend, A Comparison of Illegality between China and Germany, in Genlin Liang/ Eric Hilgendorf (ed.), Illegality: Consensus and Disagreement, Peking University Press, 2020.

5. Ye Liangfang, Die Position des Unrechtsbewusstseins in Strafrechtssystem, in Hilgendorf (Hrsg.), Das Schuldprinzip im deutsch-chinesischen Vergleich, Mohr Siebeck, 2019.